The revolt of the masses : the story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan
Material type:
- 9789715420976
- DS 678
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
HRVVMC Library Filipiniana Books | Fil | DS 678 A46 1956 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | FIL-0000110 |
Browsing HRVVMC Library shelves, Shelving location: Filipiniana Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
DS 676 M3 1996 Mabini : and the Philippine revolution | DS 676.8 A1 D47 2012 Bantayog ni Inang Bayan : panibagong sulyap sa mga bayani ng 1869 himagsikan | DS 676.8 B7 V5 1989 Bonifacio's unfinished revolution | DS 678 A46 1956 The revolt of the masses : the story of Bonifacio and the Katipunan | DS 678 B84 1998 The cry of Balintawak : a contrived controversy : a textual analysis with appended documents | DS 678 C36 1997 French consular dispatches on the Philippine revolution | DS 678 C62 2000 The spirit of 1896 : a mirror of the Philippine past, a window on the nation's future |
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Teodoro Agoncilloʼs classic work on Andres Bonifacio and the Katipunan revolt of 1896 is framed by the tumultuous events of the 1940s such as the Japanese occupation, nominal independence in 1943, Liberation, independence from the United States, and the onset of the Cold War. Was independence in 1946 really a culmination of the revolution of 1896? Was the revolution spearheaded by the Communist-led Huk movement legitimate? Agoncilloʼs book was written in 1947 in order to hook the present onto the past. The 1890s themes of exploitation and betrayal by the propertied class, the rise of a plebeian leader, and the revolt of the masses against Spain, are implicitly being played out in the late 1940s. The politics of hooking the present onto past events and heroic figures led to the prize-winning manuscriptʼs suppression from 1948 to 1955. Finally seeing print in 1956, it provided a novel and timely reading of Bonifacio at a time when Rizalʼs legacy was being debated in the Senate and as the Church hierarchy, priests, intellectuals, students, and even general public were getting caught up in heated controversies over national heroes. The circumstances of how Agoncilloʼs work came to the attention of the author in the 1960s are also discussed.
There are no comments on this title.