Passion and compassion : mga tula sa Ingles at Pilipino
Material type:
- 9711003767
- PS 9993 L24
Item type | Current library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
HRVVMC Library Filipiniana Books | Fil | PS 9993 L24 L36 1981 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Available | FIL-0000250 |
Browsing HRVVMC Library shelves, Shelving location: Filipiniana Books Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
PS 9993 G655 M56 2013 Mindanao on my mind : and other musings | PS 9993 H58 F33 2008 Fabulists and chroniclers | PS 9993 J67 1983 Mass : a novel | PS 9993 L24 L36 1981 Passion and compassion : mga tula sa Ingles at Pilipino | PS 9993 O54 2000 An embarassment of riches | PS 9993 S223 S26 2015 Between empire and insurgency : the Philippines in the new millennium : essays in history, comparative literature, and cultural politics | PS 99992.4 U53 2010 Underground spirit : Philippine short stories in English, 1973 to 1989 Vol 1 |
The Postcolonial Perverse is a two-volume collection of fifteen different critiques of varying “aspects” of contemporary Philippine culture. The work’s “eclectic” topics range from the independent cinema movement to the mystifications of nationalist poetics, from sacrilegious “avant-garde” art to the deconstruction of an inaugural text in the Philippine anglophone tradition, and from reflections on the contact zone between science and art to the impertinent question of our foremost national hero’s quizzical gender and sexual identity. The title’s two concepts—“postcolonial” and “perverse”—are almost symmetrically split across these two books, urging the reader to more sharply intuit and “experience” the project’s central theme. Namely: that the postcolonial hybridity or cultural mixedness that characterizes Philippine life is the same thing as the perverse inability of its agents to stay committed to principled and categorical thought. In the Preface the author, Professor J. Neil C. Garcia, offers the reading that it is perhaps our culture’s relatively recent and uneven literacy—as well as its enduring residual orality—that has brought this “perverse” situation about, rendering Filipino social memory fluid and malleable on one hand, and social relations and norms eminently negotiable on the other. And yet, what’s interesting is that it is precisely upon this ambivalent cultural ground that Filipinos must endeavor to fashion their sense of collective being—which is to say, their national identity.
There are no comments on this title.